← Study Guides

📋 Fire Instructor II — Test Review Guide

NFPA 1020 Instructor Level II — lesson plan development, test item construction, supervisory/administrative duties, training evolution supervision, instructor & course evaluations, and curriculum & training program administration (9 chapters, FESI Ch. 10–18)

📊 FI2 Exam Topic Weights

Chapter / TopicApprox. WeightKey Focus
Ch. 10 — Records, Reports & Scheduling~5%NFPA 1401, records vs. reports, contact vs. instructional hours
Ch. 11 — Lesson Plan Development~18%Mager/ABCD objectives, Bloom's six levels, literature tiers, ancillary materials
Ch. 12 — Training Evolution Supervision~8%IMS on the training ground, hazard vs. risk, CRM, prop suitability
Ch. 13 — Test Item Construction~14%Objective vs. subjective items, oral/performance tests, criterion-referenced design
Ch. 14 — Supervisory & Administrative Duties~14%Empowerment, 8-step scheduling, Priority 1/2/3, budgets & FOIA
Ch. 15 — Instructor & Class Evaluations~5%Formal evaluation guidelines, course-evaluation ethics
Ch. 16 — Course & Curriculum Development~14%4-step model, needs/gap analysis, benefit-cost analysis (Level III duties)
Ch. 17 — Evaluating Courses, Programs & Instructors~8%Goals/process/outcomes-based evaluation, 360° feedback, CAR/CSR (Level III duties)
Ch. 18 — Training Program Administration~14%Policy/procedure/guideline, FERPA, RFP/bid process, hiring (Level III duties)
📝 Section 1 — Records, Reports, and Scheduling (Ch. 10)

Records vs. Reports

Training RecordsTraining Reports
What it isPermanent account/data of an event or actionNarrative/summary of training activity
ContentsHours, attendees, objectives achieved, resources usedWhat occurred, who participated, issues/concerns
PurposeLegal document; archive of training practicesInforms administrators; supports planning decisions

NFPA 1401 governs all training schedules, records, reports, and state certification records.

Contact Hours vs. Instructional Hours

Contact Hours (per student) × Number of Students = Instructional Hours Example: a 4-hr class of 20 students = 4 contact hours, but 80 instructional hours

Instructor Level Reporting Responsibilities

LevelTypical Responsibilities
Level IInjury reports, training activity reports, lesson outcome (grade) reports
Level IIBudget requests, budget administration, purchase requests
Level IIIDivision annual budget, accident investigation

AAR — 5 Questions

Mission → Went Well → Could Improve → Do Differently → Who Needs to Know

Four Parts of a Written Report

Heading → Introduction (who/what/when/where/why) → Body → Conclusion/Summary

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Test scores go directly to the student, in writing — access limited to instructor + student only. Incident/injury records may be released publicly only with proper authorization or cause — not automatic release, not automatic sealing.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Record retention SCHEDULES live in Chapter 14, not Chapter 10 — Ch. 10 only says records must be secure and may still be subpoenaed.

📚 Section 2 — Lesson Plan Development (Ch. 11)

Mager Model + ABCD Method

Mager: Behavior + Condition + Standard/Degree ABCD adds Audience: Audience → Behavior → Condition → Degree

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: "Understand, know, comprehend, learn" do NOT indicate a measurable result. Use an action verb (explain, demonstrate, identify). Every objective needs 5 qualities: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-focused (easy to forget the fifth).

Bloom's Six Cognitive Levels (ordered, cumulative)

LevelSignature Verbs
RememberDescribe, define, label, list, match
UnderstandExplain, summarize, compare/contrast, predict
ApplyDemonstrate, compute, solve, operate
AnalyzeDivide into parts, relate to the whole
EvaluateJudge, justify, discriminate, conclude — uses ALL levels below
CreateDesign, organize, integrate, revise — highest/most complex

Three Tiers of Literature

TierReliability
PrimaryDirect knowledge of the event — most credible
SecondaryBased on primary, compiled by someone without direct knowledge — acceptable if primary was accurate
TertiaryTwice removed from the original — a starting point only, NOT definitive

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Never trust an aggregator/relinked site at face value — the copy may be altered, quoted inaccurately, or stripped of context. Always follow the link back to the original.

Ancillary Materials

MaterialPurpose
HandoutsCover gaps the textbook doesn't; can distract if overused
WorksheetsApply/analyze/evaluate; affective ones may support >1 objective
Skill sheetsOperational steps + critical criteria; critical-criteria failure fails the entire skill

Slide Design & First Use

24pt+ type · one topic per slide · high-contrast simple backgrounds · parallel structure Slides support the lecture — they never replace it

An experienced instructor should teach a brand-new lesson plan first — new plans may look great on paper but fall short in practice. Evaluate/revise in order: Review Scores → Review Evaluations → Review Objectives.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Case studies teach or reaffirm positive behavior only — never assign blame to a person or department. Treat the incident as a finished, unchangeable moment.

🎯 Section 3 — Training Evolution Supervision (Ch. 12)

IMS on the Training Ground

The instructor in charge staffs the needed IC positions: Safety Officer, Logistics, Staging, Division/Group Supervisor, Communications, PIO, Water Supply Officer, and the training-specific Ignition Officer (a real listed position — just training-only).

Postincident Critique — Match the Fix to the Finding

FindingCorrect Response
Students didn't learn the objectivesRestage the evolution
The evolution itself was flawedRedesign the evolution
Safety problem discoveredFix it before the evolution is reused
Instructor gave inadequate supervisionAdditional professional development

Hazard vs. Risk

HAZARD = the source (a condition, substance, or device) RISK = the exposure/likelihood of harm from that hazard

Safety Culture

Normalization of deviance = SOPs routinely ignored until disregard becomes normal. Countered by Crew Resource Management (CRM): situational awareness, leadership/assertiveness/communication, flexibility, event/mission analysis.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: CRM is explicitly NOT strict seniority-based decision-making.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: NFPA 1400 safety enforcement is shared — instructor-in-charge + safety officer + organization's administration, all three together. Accident investigation is fact-finding, not fault-finding.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: A prop used beyond manufacturer spec doesn't get used "carefully" — it goes unused and a replacement is located, no exceptions.

✏️ Section 4 — Test Item Construction (Ch. 13)

Objective vs. Subjective Items

ObjectiveSubjective
DefinitionOne correct answer; evaluator judgment has no effectNo single correct answer; evaluator judgment may affect scoring
TypesMultiple-choice, true/false, matchingShort-answer, essay, interpretive exercise

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Don't assume objective items only test basic recall — properly constructed, they reach evaluation/creation-level thinking too.

Item-Writing Rules

Matching: ONE MORE response than prompts (prevents elimination guessing); sets of 5 for scan sheets Completion: blank near the END of the sentence; NEVER "a/an" before a blank (gives away the answer) Essay: state point value + time allotted; ~60 seconds per required major point

Oral & Performance Tests

Closed oral questions test knowledge; open oral questions test response-under-pressure. Despite subjective scoring, oral is the most valid/reliable way to test verbal communication and judgment. Performance tests: same equipment/sequence/basis for every student; certification testing needs more than one evaluator.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Some skill sheets (e.g., vehicle extrication) require 100% completion to pass — don't assume partial credit exists on hazardous psychomotor evaluations.

Criterion- vs. Norm-Referenced

Criterion-ReferencedNorm-Referenced
Compared againstA fixed standardOther students
Item difficultyMatches the objective's level (prepared students pass)Deliberately spreads out scores
Dominant useMost fire/EMS certification testsRanking/promotional exams

Giveaways to Avoid

Correct answers consistently longer than distractors · stereotypical answers · an item that reveals another item's answer

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Pass criteria (e.g., 76% written vs. 100% performance) must be stated in BOTH the test instructions and the scoring sheet — in advance.

🗂️ Section 5 — Supervisory and Administrative Duties (Ch. 14)

Empowerment

Sharing authority/leadership with supervised instructors — requires the supervisor to relinquish some control. Celebrate achievements publicly and ASAP; resolve conflict by focusing on results, not personalities.

Eight-Step Schedule Creation Process

Assess factors → Determine needs → Determine requirements → Determine availability → Coordinate training → Create schedule → Publish schedule → Revise schedule

Training Priority Classification

PriorityDefinitionExample
1Mandated by federal/state/provincial lawCert/recert, hazmat, respiratory protection
2Required to meet an org/jurisdiction goalCertify all responders to Ops-level collapse
3Neither mandated nor required, but beneficialCertify everyone to Tech-level "when resources allow"

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Priority 1 ALWAYS wins over Priority 2/3, regardless of what was already scheduled.

Funding Sources

SourceCharacter
GrantGov't funding for a specific project; no repayment, but accountable
Block grantConsolidated, few restrictions, bolsters community involvement directly
Charitable donationFrom service clubs/civic organizations; targeted or general

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: A lease/lease-purchase is a METHOD of acquiring capital items — NOT itself a funding source. Money budgeted for one line item (e.g., manuals) stays there — never diverted, even to equipment.

Records & FOIA

FOIA presumes records OPEN — the burden of proving an exemption falls on the jurisdiction, not the requester. Exposure-report records must be retained as long as, or longer than, other records following an employee's retirement/termination.

🧑‍🏫 Section 6 — Instructor and Class Evaluations (Ch. 15)

Six Guidelines for Formal Evaluations

Communicate the process → Administer timely → State criteria clearly → Ensure uniform standards → Maintain thorough records → Ensure objectivity

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Formal evaluations are ALWAYS held privately — but a signed copy still reaches the instructor within 5 business days and is filed in the personnel record.

Follow-Up on Deficiencies

If a documented deficiency isn't fixed after the first evaluation, hold formal meetings to determine whether supplementary training or mentoring would help — don't just re-flag it at the next annual review.

Course Evaluations (Student Feedback)

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: NEVER edit, alter, or delete a course evaluation — it's unethical and may be a violation of the law. Turn in ALL evaluations exactly as received.

A 1–5 numeric scale allows statistical averaging across classes. Response rates run lower with no completion requirement — some programs withhold the completion certificate until the evaluation is submitted.

📐 Section 7 — Course and Curriculum Development (Ch. 16)

⚠️ SOURCE NOTE: This chapter's own material explicitly attributes these duties to the "Level III instructor," not Level II — even though it's numbered within the FI2 chapter range (10–18). Carried forward here exactly as the source guide frames it: forward-looking, program-level content that previews Instructor III / Training Program Manager.

Four-Step Course/Curriculum Development Model

Identify (needs analysis) → Design (program/course) → Implement (pilot, then add to the schedule) → Evaluate (after the pilot AND every presentation)

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: This is NOT the same as FI1's Four-Step Method of Instruction (Preparation/Presentation/Application/Evaluation) — different model, different scale (whole courses, not one lesson).

Needs Analysis vs. Gap Analysis vs. BCA

ToolQuestion It Answers
Needs analysisWhat training is needed at all? (reviews standards, injury data, records)
Gap analysisWhere does actual performance fall short of the standard/best practice?
Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA)Is it cheaper to buy/contract (e.g., an IFSTA curriculum) than build from scratch?

Curriculum Implementation — 8 Steps

Approval → Materials/aids → Facilities/equipment → Instructors → Records systems → Schedule/announce → Registration → Pilot (final step)

Validity, Reliability & Distractors

Validity = matches the learning objectives. Reliability = consistent results classifying mastery/nonmastery. Longer tests are more reliable, NOT necessarily more valid, and can eventually lose reliability too.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: A distractor no one ever picks needs revision — it isn't separating students who know the material from those who don't.

📈 Section 8 — Evaluating Courses, Programs, and Instructors (Ch. 17)

⚠️ SOURCE NOTE: Like Ch. 16 above, the source text frames this chapter's duties as "Level III instructor" work — carried forward exactly as written, not smoothed over.

Three Evaluation Methods

MethodFocuses OnAssessment Type
Goals-basedMeeting goals/objectives, fit with missionSummative
Process-basedHow it works in practice; strengths/weaknessesFormative
Outcomes-basedMeasurable benefit (e.g., -20% workplace injuries)Results-focused

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Outcomes-based is SUMMATIVE (final benefit); process-based is FORMATIVE (ongoing function) — don't assume "outcomes" sounds forward-looking so it must be formative.

360-Degree Feedback & CAR/CSR

Compared to an IC's size-up — situation reports from all sides (supervisors, peers, students) reveal what one vantage point misses. Annual evaluations quantify cognitive and psychomotor performance; responses stay confidential. Statistically synthesized scores = Customer Approval Rating (CAR), a.k.a. Customer Satisfaction Rating (CSR).

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: Don't over-prescribe remediation — sometimes the fix for a struggling instructor on a brand-new course is simple orientation, not full professional development.

🏛️ Section 9 — Training Program Administration (Ch. 18)

⚠️ SOURCE NOTE: Same caveat as Ch. 16–17 — this is "Level III instructor" territory in the source text, included here as the capstone/forward-looking material for the FI2 exam.

Policy / Procedure / Guideline Hierarchy

DocumentPurpose
PolicyStates the organization's position/intent
ProcedureIdentifies the steps needed to fulfill a policy's intent
GuidelineAids a judgment call (e.g., cancel training for weather?)

Document Development Sequence

Identify need → Draft → AHJ review/comment → Adopt → Publish → Implement → Evaluate effectiveness

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: FERPA only applies to organizations receiving U.S. Department of Education funding — technically OPTIONAL for most local fire departments, though recommended as best practice (no more posting scores on a bulletin board).

Bid Process & Purchasing

Capital purchases → RFP → bid process. A restrictive (sole-sourced) bid (specs only one manufacturer can meet) needs a documented variance/exemption. Bid evaluation matrix: requirements down the side, bidders across the top, scored values in the boxes.

⚠️ EXAM TRAP: A late budget request (after the initial submission) can take upward of 18 months before funding is available.

Hiring Instructional Staff

Instructors must meet AHJ-mandated qualifications (e.g., NFPA 1020 Level I instructor requirements) — topic expertise only counts if the instructor can actually transmit it to students.

⚠️ Top FI2 Exam Traps

© The Firefighter Medic